The World Federation One Stop Fiqh
Search
Menu

32. Slaughtering and Hunting Animals

+ Read more
  • Ruling 2620

    If, for example, an animal falls into some water after it is hit by an arrow and one knows that the animal has died due to being hit by both the arrow and falling into the water, the …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2621

    If a person hunts an animal with a dog or a weapon that is usurped (ghaṣbī), the animal is lawful to eat and belongs to him. However, in addition to the fact that he has sinned, he must …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2622

    If a person uses a sword or some other hunting weapon to cut off some parts of an animal’s body, such as its front and back legs, those parts are unlawful to eat. However, if the animal is …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2623

    If an animal is cut in two with some wood, stone, or something else with which it is not correct to hunt an animal, the part that does not have the head and neck is unlawful to eat. …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2624

    If an animal is killed by hunting or is slaughtered and a live offspring is taken out of its womb, in the event that the offspring is slaughtered according to the instructions mentioned earlier, it is lawful to …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2625

    If an animal is killed by hunting or is slaughtered and a dead offspring is taken out of its womb, it is pure and lawful to eat in the event that it did not die before its mother …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2626

    If a hunting dog hunts a wild animal that is lawful to eat, the hunted animal is pure and lawful to eat if six conditions are fulfilled: the dog must be trained in a manner that whenever it …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2627

    If the person who sent the dog reaches the prey when there is enough time for him to slaughter it, in the event that some time passes while he does some things that are preliminary to slaughtering it, …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2628

    If a person sends a number of dogs to hunt a prey together and all of them fulfil the conditions mentioned in Ruling 2626, the prey is lawful to eat. But if one of the dogs does not …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 2629

    If a person sends a dog to hunt an animal and the dog hunts another animal instead, that animal is lawful to eat and pure. Also, if the dog hunts that animal and another animal, both of them …

    + Read more